13 Comments
User's avatar
Peter Moore's avatar

I attended the notorious/profitable White Dudes for Harris online fundraiser/rallying cry. The subtle subtext there: Women rule, so the least we feckless guys can do is support them. It mocked whiteness as a kind of disability, given how white men have been subverted to the dark side of human nature. The men on the call gave 4.5 million reasons why they might be able to contribute something or other, after all.

Expand full comment
Maya Rodale's avatar

I was thrilled to see the White Dudes for Harris call happening! It gave me extra hope that we might really elect our first female president. My husband was there too. I am plotting a post about how men organized for women's suffrage--"suffragents"--and how they were the ones who had to vote to expand the electorate. This kind of monumental change takes all of us working together :-)

Expand full comment
Peter Moore's avatar

Suffragents! Love it! Sign me up!

Expand full comment
Susan Corso's avatar

Amen, amen, amen. Susan B. Anthony stood in for the skeleton of the movement--that upon which all other bits and bobs are dependent. I am so grateful for her. In fact, it was when I discovered her that I first learned to appreciate my own name ...

Expand full comment
Maya Rodale's avatar

Cheers to all Susans! :-)

Expand full comment
Elizabeth Kerri Mahon's avatar

I love this article! Without women like Susan B. Anthony, Carrie Chapman Catt (who was also childless), and Alice Paul, the suffragist movement would probably not have made as many strides as it did. As you pointed out Anthony had the time to travel around the country, give speeches, organize conventions, and babysit so that ECS could have some me time to write.

The Republican VP nominee is also ignoring the facts. Women outnumber men which means that there was always going to be a portion of the female population who aren't married. And many of us choose not to have children, not because we don't like them, but because the world is over-populated as it is. Kids are also expensive. I'm continually amazed that my parents were able to send me not only to public school but also college.

Expand full comment
Elizabeth Kerri Mahon's avatar

I meant private school, not public school!

Expand full comment
Maya Rodale's avatar

Also: "Women outnumber men which means that there was always going to be a portion of the female population who aren't married." I feel like this should spark a league of superheroines or something :-)

Expand full comment
Maya Rodale's avatar

THANK YOU for mentioning Carrie Chapman Catt and Alice Paul! They totally deserve to be mentioned in this too. I totally agree that their ability to devote themselves to the cause really helped us all get the vote.

Expand full comment
Leslie Carroll's avatar

It's historical fiction but my heroine has to care for her family...she's the sole breadwinner.

Expand full comment
Leslie Carroll's avatar

Maya, I LOVE THIS! I am writing my second novel, where the protagonist is a 19thc author who chose to remain unmarried because her husband would own her work and not only would she have been his chattel at the time and would have to devote the time she would have preferred to spend writing to his care and feeding (and raising the eventual children, much as she adored kids) -- but her WRITING, her work product -- would have been HIS property as well, and if she wrote anything that displeased him, he could forbid her to write (that, or ever again). I chose not to have children for a variety of reasons [I'm allergic to cats, though I like them]. My first marriage was to the son of Holocaust survivors who had a lot of anger and emotional baggage [long after our divorce he tragically took his own life] and I was also often juggling 3 survival jobs while pursing my career as an actress and later, an actor-manager of my own nonprofit professional theatre company. I saw firsthand the sacrifices other actresses (never the actors, somehow) made to schlep young kids (they couldn't afford childcare -- as I would not have been able to do) to auditions and rehearsals and the toll it took on both parent and child (Mommy is making out with a man who isn't daddy!!); or the kid having a meltdown in the middle of rehearsal, so the actress had to leave the room to handle the situation. Impossible for the parent emotionally; confusing, and possibly psychologically damaging for a child too young to understand that it was make-believe; unfair to the rest of the cast and production team that had a finite time in the room they were paying for. Even my mom, who went back to a fulltime job in advertising after my sister and I were old enough to come home from school on our own, and broke some glass ceilings at the very staid J. Walter Thompson, is STILL resented by my sister, who claims she became a "latchkey kid" as a result, while I applauded my mother for claiming the career she always wanted, and put on hold in order to have kids. [My sister cheerfully left her MBA to moulder, quit a high powered job in marketing to have and raise her 2 kids. They're great kids, but she's always been a helicopter parent. All of her friends always had jobs, too, while they raised their kids.]

Expand full comment
Maya Rodale's avatar

Thank you! What a conflict for your novel! Good luck to your heroine and her work! Is it a romance?

Omg it's so hard to have kids and to care for them while also being a creative and/or working mom, as your stories show. That's one reason why I think it's so important that we are able to choose whether or not we become parents. And hi, from one latchkey kid of a working mom to another!

Expand full comment
Zena Ryder's avatar

Love this article!

Expand full comment